While I was Away…

Posted July 16, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Random Ruminations

In case you were wondering where I have been:

  • I brought my first year in a new school to an end, no great trajedies nor triumphs to share
  • I put in a new floor in our den, (more in a separate post)
  • And, I went to San Francisco for a week-long conference

San Francisco (or, “the city,” to use the correct local parlance) was wonderful. I was diligent and went to most of the conference, but I was able to opt out a little, and spent one memorable afternoon visiting to the old “Beat Generation” parts of town. After I made the obligatory homage visit to “City Lights Bookstore,” I wandered across Jack Kerouac Alley and into “Vesuvio.” While vesuvioabsorbing the literary aura, I was befriended by Rodger Jacobs, an author and sometimes doorman for the bar. Rodger was a wonderful host, and a fascinating character. Our conversation wandered from consideration of the best Irish authors to the worst Southern ones. By the end of our afternoon together I felt that I had in some way come in contact with an authentic life and had a brief brush with the ghosts of Kerouac, Thomas and Twain. Rodger was even kind enough to give me a mention in his blog.

If you are ever in The City, don’t miss the chance for a visit!

Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa, Mea Maxima Culpa

Posted July 16, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Venting

OK, so my apology for a prolonged absence is made in latin. Latin? you say… Well, it seems that the Empire is bringing back the old tongue…and it may be visiting a church near you! The official church document is called Moto Proprio, and I’ve added an unofficial translation of the original latin text for your reading pleasure.

MOTU PROPRIO “SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM”

VATICAN CITY, JUL 7, 2007 (VIS) – Given below is a non-official English-language translation of the Apostolic Letter “Motu Proprio data” of Pope Benedict XVI, “Summorum Pontificum,” concerning the use of the Roman liturgy prior to the reform of 1970. The original text is written in Latin.

SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM

Up to our own times, it has been the constant concern of supreme pontiffs to ensure that the Church of Christ offers a worthy ritual to the Divine Majesty, ‘to the praise and glory of His name,’ and ‘to the benefit of all His Holy Church.’

Since time immemorial it has been necessary – as it is also for the future – to maintain the principle according to which ‘each particular Church must concur with the universal Church, not only as regards the doctrine of the faith and the sacramental signs, but also as regards the usages universally accepted by uninterrupted apostolic tradition, which must be observed not only to avoid errors but also to transmit the integrity of the faith, because the Church’s law of prayer corresponds to her law of faith.’ (1)

Among the pontiffs who showed that requisite concern, particularly outstanding is the name of St. Gregory the Great, who made every effort to ensure that the new peoples of Europe received both the Catholic faith and the treasures of worship and culture that had been accumulated by the Romans in preceding centuries. He commanded that the form of the sacred liturgy as celebrated in Rome (concerning both the Sacrifice of Mass and the Divine Office) be conserved. He took great concern to ensure the dissemination of monks and nuns who, following the Rule of St. Benedict, together with the announcement of the Gospel illustrated with their lives the wise provision of their Rule that ‘nothing should be placed before the work of God.’ In this way the sacred liturgy, celebrated according to the Roman use, enriched not only the faith and piety but also the culture of many peoples. It is known, in fact, that the Latin liturgy of the Church in its various forms, in each century of the Christian era, has been a spur to the spiritual life of many saints, has reinforced many peoples in the virtue of religion and fecundated their piety.

Many other Roman pontiffs, in the course of the centuries, showed particular solicitude in ensuring that the sacred liturgy accomplished this task more effectively. Outstanding among them is St. Pius V who, sustained by great pastoral zeal and following the exhortations of the Council of Trent, renewed the entire liturgy of the Church, oversaw the publication of liturgical books amended and ‘renewed in accordance with the norms of the Fathers,’ and provided them for the use of the Latin Church.

One of the liturgical books of the Roman rite is the Roman Missal, which developed in the city of Rome and, with the passing of the centuries, little by little took forms very similar to that it has had in recent times.

‘It was towards this same goal that succeeding Roman Pontiffs directed their energies during the subsequent centuries in order to ensure that the rites and liturgical books were brought up to date and when necessary clarified. From the beginning of this century they undertook a more general reform.’ (2) Thus our predecessors Clement VIII, Urban VIII, St. Pius X (3), Benedict XV, Pius XII and Blessed John XXIII all played a part.

In more recent times, Vatican Council II expressed a desire that the respectful reverence due to divine worship should be renewed and adapted to the needs of our time. Moved by this desire our predecessor, the Supreme Pontiff Paul VI, approved, in 1970, reformed and partly renewed liturgical books for the Latin Church. These, translated into the various languages of the world, were willingly accepted by bishops, priests and faithful. John Paul II amended the third typical edition of the Roman Missal. Thus Roman pontiffs have operated to ensure that ‘this kind of liturgical edifice … should again appear resplendent for its dignity and harmony.’ (4)

But in some regions, no small numbers of faithful adhered and continue to adhere with great love and affection to the earlier liturgical forms. These had so deeply marked their culture and their spirit that in 1984 the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, moved by a concern for the pastoral care of these faithful, with the special indult ‘Quattuor abhinc anno,” issued by the Congregation for Divine Worship, granted permission to use the Roman Missal published by Blessed John XXIII in the year 1962. Later, in the year 1988, John Paul II with the Apostolic Letter given as Motu Proprio, ‘Ecclesia Dei,’ exhorted bishops to make generous use of this power in favor of all the faithful who so desired.

Following the insistent prayers of these faithful, long deliberated upon by our predecessor John Paul II, and after having listened to the views of the Cardinal Fathers of the Consistory of 22 March 2006, having reflected deeply upon all aspects of the question, invoked the Holy Spirit and trusting in the help of God, with these Apostolic Letters we establish the following:

Art 1.    The Roman Missal promulgated by Paul VI is the ordinary expression of the ‘Lex orandi’ (Law of prayer) of the Catholic Church of the Latin rite. Nonetheless, the Roman Missal promulgated by St. Pius V and reissued by Bl. John XXIII is to be considered as an extraordinary expression of that same ‘Lex orandi,’ and must be given due honour for its venerable and ancient usage. These two expressions of the Church’s Lex orandi will in no any way lead to a division in the Church’s ‘Lex credendi’ (Law of belief). They are, in fact two usages of the one Roman rite.

It is, therefore, permissible to celebrate the Sacrifice of the Mass following the typical edition of the Roman Missal promulgated by Bl. John XXIII in 1962 and never abrogated, as an extraordinary form of the Liturgy of the Church. The conditions for the use of this Missal as laid down by earlier documents ‘Quattuor abhinc annis’ and ‘Ecclesia Dei,’ are substituted as follows:

Art. 2.    In Masses celebrated without the people, each Catholic priest of the Latin rite, whether secular or regular, may use the Roman Missal published by Bl. Pope John XXIII in 1962, or the Roman Missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI in 1970, and may do so on any day with the exception of the Easter Triduum. For such celebrations, with either one Missal or the other, the priest has no need for permission from the Apostolic See or from his Ordinary.

Art. 3.     Communities of Institutes of consecrated life and of Societies of apostolic life, of either pontifical or diocesan right, wishing to celebrate Mass in accordance with the edition of the Roman Missal promulgated in 1962, for conventual or “community” celebration in their oratories, may do so. If an individual community or an entire Institute or Society wishes to undertake such celebrations often, habitually or permanently, the decision must be taken by the Superiors Major, in accordance with the law and following their own specific decrees and statues.

Art. 4.     Celebrations of Mass as mentioned above in Art. 2 may – observing all the norms of law – also be attended by faithful who, of their own free will, ask to be admitted.

Art. 5.     § 1 In parishes, where there is a stable group of faithful who adhere to the earlier liturgical tradition, the pastor should willingly accept their requests to celebrate the Mass according to the rite of the Roman Missal published in 1962, and ensure that the welfare of these faithful harmonises with the ordinary pastoral care of the parish, under the guidance of the bishop in accordance with canon 392, avoiding discord and favouring the unity of the whole Church.

§ 2 Celebration in accordance with the Missal of Bl. John XXIII may take place on working days; while on Sundays and feast days one such celebration may also be held.

§ 3 For faithful and priests who request it, the pastor should also allow celebrations in this extraordinary form for special circumstances such as marriages, funerals or occasional celebrations, e.g. pilgrimages.

§ 4 Priests who use the Missal of Bl. John XXIII must be qualified to do so and not juridically impeded.

§ 5 In churches that are not parish or conventual churches, it is the duty of the Rector of the church to grant the above permission.

Art. 6.     In Masses celebrated in the presence of the people in accordance with the Missal of Bl. John XXIII, the readings may be given in the vernacular, using editions recognised by the Apostolic See.

Art. 7.    If a group of lay faithful, as mentioned in art. 5 § 1, has not obtained satisfaction to their requests from the pastor, they should inform the diocesan bishop. The bishop is strongly requested to satisfy their wishes. If he cannot arrange for such celebration to take place, the matter should be referred to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”.

Art. 8.    A bishop who, desirous of satisfying such requests, but who for various reasons is unable to do so, may refer the problem to the Commission “Ecclesia Dei” to obtain counsel and assistance.

Art. 9.     § 1 The pastor, having attentively examined all aspects, may also grant permission to use the earlier ritual for the administration of the Sacraments of Baptism, Marriage, Penance, and the Anointing of the Sick, if the good of souls would seem to require it.

§ 2 Ordinaries are given the right to celebrate the Sacrament of Confirmation using the earlier Roman Pontifical, if the good of souls would seem to require it.

§ 3 Clerics ordained “in sacris constitutis” may use the Roman Breviary promulgated by Bl. John XXIII in 1962.

Art. 10. The ordinary of a particular place, if he feels it appropriate, may erect a personal parish in accordance with can. 518 for celebrations following the ancient form of the Roman rite, or appoint a chaplain, while observing all the norms of law.

Art. 11.    The Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”, erected by John Paul II in 1988 (5), continues to exercise its function. Said Commission will have the form, duties and norms that the Roman Pontiff wishes to assign it.

Art. 12. This Commission, apart from the powers it enjoys, will exercise the authority of the Holy See, supervising the observance and application of these dispositions.

We order that everything We have established with these Apostolic Letters issued as Motu Proprio be considered as “established and decreed”, and to be observed from 14 September of this year, Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross, whatever there may be to the contrary.

From Rome, at St. Peter’s, 7 July 2007, third year of Our Pontificate.”

Prescription Co-Pays to High???? …Maybe you should Head to Brazil

Posted May 11, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Venting

Brazil has a brand new Saint; Galvao was an early 19th century monk who distributed tiny pills made out of rice paper with a latin inscription about the Blessed Virgin. The pills were credited with curing everything from demonic possession to epilepsy (which are often cross diagnosed by the church…). Even today, the cloistered sisters of Brazil work hard to produce enough pills to meet the continuous demand.

Generally at this point a typical smart alec liberal (like myself) would write something conceited about peasants and uneducated beliefs in supernatural cures and how the church has capitalized on these fears in the past. But not today; today I have a headache, and for no good reason… I didn’t even have a glass of wine last night. So who am I to say that the pain in my head isn’t being caused by a couple of demons, who live behind my left ear, pounding on a tiny brass bell? Which, of course, is in punishment for my great, great, great grandfather’s failure to genuflect when he passed in front of a roadside Marion Shrine just outside of Cork on his way to a cattle auction.

Thanks a lot Grandpa O’Paddie.

Will anyone be traveling to a small Brazillian monastery in the near future…? There’s a package I’d like you to pick-up for me.

I Got Tagged… a good thing?

Posted May 9, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Random Ruminations

Doodaddy has tagged me, and now I seem to be (virtually) obligated to list things about myself. The idea is for you, gentle reader (yes, both of you) two comment on which of the following statements is untrue.

1. I am a descendant of Irish railroad workers.

2. My college mascot was a bee, albeit a “fighting bee”

3. I love folk music. (and will actually admit that to people).

4. I am an ordained catholic cleric, but not a priest.

5. I love the DH rule in American league baseball.

6. Try as I might, I can never figure out when a train leaving Chicago going 60 miles an hour will meet a train coming from Denver going 75 miles an hour, I only know not to buy a ticket on either train.

7. As a young man I was lucky enough to travel the world, unfortunately some of that world was in the middle east…and I was in the usmc.

8. I have had breakfast with the pope, really, I’ve got pictures and everything.

9. I have jumped out of airplanes, on purpose.

10. I have written three books…that less than three people have read.

OK, there you go. Some may be obvious, or just boring. Feel free to take a guess, but I promise; only one is untrue. Now I’m going to head over to BusyMom and see what juicy tidbits she has revealed. “Lions and tigers and bears, Oh My!”

While working on a homily one day…

Posted May 4, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Homilies, Random Ruminations

I was thinking about some homily ideas last night and I remembered a book I had read years ago; Theodore Roosevelt’s Letters to his Children. TR is usually pictured as the larger than life example of all things large, loud and really American. You know; carrying big sticks and hijacking small countries. But however you may lean on his politics; he wrote some of the most wonderful letters to his children that I’ve ever read. They were first collected and published almost 100 years ago, but there have been two recent republications. Link to one of them.

TR’s Letters to his Children

ps. amazon lists about 20 used copies, I think you can get them for about $2.00…

Church Closes Limbo… no hope left for pagan babies

Posted May 2, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Venting

It took more than a decade and over 31 theologians to convince the Holy Roman Empire to do away with the concept of Limbo… if you listen closely you can hear the screams of pagan babies. The NCR has more.

Take Action… ADOPT A PAGAN BABY

Pagan Baby Adoption Certificate

Don’t know why you would want this…

Posted May 2, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Random Ruminations

Here is a link to the web-page that I maintain for my history students: can’t imagine anyone who doesn’t have to pass my course wanting to look at it, but what the heck. Let me know about all the errors you find.

I just "googled," and now I’m afraid to go outside…

Posted May 2, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Venting

Alright, I admit that I’ve been away from the blog world for a bit, but what have you people been up to? BusyMom sent me a link to check out some religious blogs, and after reading a few (especially the comments) I must admit: I am afraid.

But the Lord hates a coward, I’m sure I read that somewhere, and so I shall post… dam the peccadilloes, full speed ahead, onward christian soldier, blah blah blah, etc etc etc. Fini.

4th Sunday of Lent 2007

Posted May 1, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Uncategorized

4th Sunday of Lent – 2007

The Scribes and Pharisees criticized Jesus, because he ate with sinners.
And so Jesus told them a story. A story that we hear dependent on our point of view.

Many look at it from the point of view of the youngest son – the prodigal
- the one who wasted his inheritance in a foreign land and ended up going from bad to worse until he comes to his senses and flees homeward, hoping that there he can put his life together again – even if it must be as a servant.

Others of us identify with the father in the story – especially those of us who happen to be parents of children who have gone, or may yet go, wrong in some way.

Think of the father in today’s gospel for a minute. Think of his pain.
His youngest child – his youngest son has turned out badly.

We don’t know why the father gave in to the demands of his youngest son. Parents know that children are different. It is impossible to treat children the same, and that makes child-rearing the most complex of all human tasks. A scientist that I know once said that there are three unknowable mysteries: the origin of the universe, whether the universe is expanding or contracting, and how to raise a teenager.

Perhaps the father gave in because he figured if he did not his son would only get worse. Maybe he just didn’t know what else to do.

Whatever the reason – many of us can identify with the pain that the father must have felt; the second guessing – the constant worry -and the constant wondering…

- Will my boy make it? – Will he survive? – Will he ever come home?

Those who identify with the father understand what happens at the end of story. They understand why the father, upon seeing in the distance his son returning home, lifts his robes and runs to meet him.

But what about the other son in the story? What about the oldest brother?
How many of us, identify with him?

How many of you are the oldest child in your family?
How many first-born do we have? Would you raise your hand?

Now, how many of you were the baby in your family?
Would you raise your hands?

Now, for those in the first group – How many of you felt like those in the second group got away with things you could never have gotten away with?

I’m an only child, so I don’t know, but the older brother seems like the good guy in the story.

The older brother is like a lot of us.
He gets up and goes to work every day. He has to. It is expected. If not him, who? We can understand his feelings for his brother.

First, he asked for his inheritance early, while his father was still alive.
That was selfish and an insult. It was the same as wishing his father dead.

I think we can imagine the conversation he must have had with himself…
And then he squanders it all. He never was responsible. He took it and went away and just wasted it. All the money that it had taken our family generations to accumulate. He spent it on sin and high living. It served him right that he wound up feeding somebody’s pigs. He deserved it.

But then he came home. And of course, my father throws a party. Nobody ever threw a party for me. Nobody ever appreciated that I stuck around and did what I was supposed to do. I didn’t waste Dad’s money. I worked hard in the fields every day. And my father barely acknowledges me!

And who do you think will be the one responsible enough to take care of our father when he grows old? My brother? No. It will be me. Because I am the responsible one around here.

Yes, father, little brother can come home – but don’t throw a party!
Make him grovel a little.
He asked to be a servant. Let him do that for a while.
He doesn’t deserve to wear your fine robes. –Sound familiar?

It should – because the older brother is that responsible part in all of us who doesn’t like it when somebody else gets something for nothing.

The older brother is that part of us that measures and weighs every deed for its value – every person for what they have earned or deserve – and has decided that by comparison we aren’t getting what we deserve – or that someone else is getting more than they deserve.

The tax collectors and sinners with whom Jesus ate are not simply good folk who have been misunderstood. They were making a good living taking money from their own people on behalf of the Romans.

The Pharisees and other guardians of law and order could see the corrosive effect of not distinguishing between good and evil people.

As we think about it – doesn’t forgiving look a lot like condoning?

To Jesus’ listeners 2000 years ago, and perhaps to us today, the party is what is really offensive in the story.

Let the penitent return, there’s nothing wrong with that. Both Judaism and Christianity allow for that. But let him return to bread and water – not fatted calf; to sackcloth and ashes – not to expensive robes….

Those to whom Jesus told the story of the prodigal family were responsible people. They followed the letter of the law. They did what they were supposed to do. And what did they see in Jesus?

They saw a man whom they recognized as a holy man -
a man whom many said was the Messiah,
one whom some said was the Son of God,
welcoming sinners and eating with them. Showing them the honor of his presence. Telling them that God loved them.

The Pharisees didn’t like that. Because those sinners hadn’t toed the line.
Yes, let them come in. But make them grovel a little.

The Pharisees, in all their super-responsibility were missing the party. They weren’t getting the message. They couldn’t hear that God had enough love for them too.

So… who are we in this story?
Are we the older son, jealous that someone else is receiving God’s love?
Are we the younger son, afraid to come home and accept God’s love?

Are we the Pharisee, so aware of what we have done and what others have failed to do that we can’t enjoy the party? That we may even resent God for being loving and forgiving?

The youngest Son learned an important lesson while starving in a foreign land. He learned that his father was a life giver.

That is something that we all need to learn.
What our real priorities are in life.
Where life is to be found – and how good that life really is.

In life; it can feel that love is finite. That our parents, our wives or husbands, or children, simply don’t have enough love to go around.

In this: We are all the Prodigal We are all the Pharisee

In the story that Jesus told to those who resented his eating with sinners, in the story he tells to that oldest brother that lives inside our hearts he says:

“My child, you are always with me. Indeed all that I have is yours – understand that – and rejoice with me that your younger brother – he who was dead, is alive – he was lost – but now is found.”

The love of God is not a quantity; an amount that can become depleted and so must be guarded. It is the only absolute constant we have.

We need not guard it,
nor measure it,
we have only to embrace and accept it.

Been Gone for Awhile…

Posted May 1, 2007 by deacondave
Categories: Uncategorized

it finally happened, the church gave me the boot. Well at least the school part of the Holy Roman Empire. Seems there was a power shift that accompanied the new bishop, and I definitely ended-up on the wrong side, with the wrong friends and very guilty of having attended the wrong schools. I found all this out when my school said they no longer had enough students to keep me on faculty, and the other Holy Roman school boss said he would like to hire me, but was warned not to; we certainly wouldn’t want someone as theologically unstable as myself influencing the young (hope I didn’t do too much damage in those first 17 years…).

I have found a new school, kind of a “boutique” high-school, with tiny class sizes and really pretty furniture. So, for the first time since I was 5 (40 some years or so…), I am starting the school year without penance, guilt, the Sacred Heart of Jesus or the Blessed Virgin. Hope I can make it thru without bursting into some spontaneous “Hail Mary’s.”

In the meantime I am still assigned to my same parish, although with a new pastor in the offing, who knows how much longer…

I have been preaching a little, and will post my recent homilies in the next few days.

Keep me in your prayers, and if anyone knows of a job for a theologian with “theological instability” issues… let me know!